|January 24, 2015||Posted by M. P. under Interview Series|
Throughout 2015 I will be posting interviews with nonprofit professionals from the Pittsburgh area. This is the first installment – an email question and answer session with Heidi Baldt Matthews. Heidi is Operations Director and Co-Founder of the Eclectic Laboratory Chamber Orchestra (E.L.C.O.), a volunteer post that is truly a labor of love as her co-founder is also her husband, David Matthews. She was the Programming Coordinator at Gateway to the Arts for 10 years and just started as the Marketing and Communications Coordinator at The Woodlands Foundation. Heidi was recently named to the board at Music on the Edge.
Name: Heidi Baldt Matthews
Years in the Pittsburgh area: About 12 years – wow! Where does time go?
First job out of college: Part Time Ticket Service Representative for ProArts Tickets
How were you drawn to nonprofit work?
I originally was looking to focus on the arts, not necessarily nonprofit. My first full-time job was with Gateway to the Arts in 2004 and I was really enthusiastic and excited to help out in any way that I could. There I learned more about the challenges and opportunities encountered by nonprofits and generally more about how they function. I also learned that there was SO MUCH MORE TO LEARN.
In 2009, I decided to pursue a master’s degree to supplement my “real world” learning. I considered a master’s in arts management, but found that Robert Morris University’s Bayer Center for Nonprofit Management program for M.S. in Nonprofit Management was a better fit for me. I found it incredibly beneficial to have classmates in different stages of their careers within the nonprofit sector. It was really interesting to gain the perspective of how people from nonprofits outside of the arts approached the same situations.
I continue to be drawn to the nonprofit sector because it’s important to me to feel good about what I do. When I have a bad day it helps so much to reflect upon the good that is capable of coming out of what can sometimes be frustrating and tiring work.
How did E.L.C.O. come to be?
Starting around 2007 my then fiancé, David, kept encouraging me to start a theatre company as it was good match with my experience in stage management and bachelor’s degree in theatre from Point Park. I didn’t want to start a theatre company just for the sake of starting a theatre company…and I didn’t yet have a distinctive idea that I liked. That conversation went on for about a year.
One day David enthusiastically handed me a proposal for an experimental chamber music ensemble. He wanted to present classical music alongside pop and rock music to reach new audiences that had never experienced orchestral music before. Without hesitation, I said, “Let’s do it.”
We placed an ad on Craigslist and put up fliers around town and at the universities with a call for auditions for volunteer experimental chamber musicians. We had folks auditioning in our tiny living room and David’s attic studio. It was nuts. The double bass player almost smacked the top of her instrument on our ceiling fan. The Brew House on the South Side helped us with performance space and support for our first concert in November 2008.
E.L.C.O. applied for and was granted nonprofit status at the end of 2013. It was a big decision for us. I’m firmly of the opinion that an organization should not become a nonprofit just because it can. The three directors of E.L.C.O. (David Matthews – Artistic Director, Alan Tormey – Associate Creative Director and I) take this status very seriously. We experimented with different business models and strategies, and with the help of Greater Pittsburgh Art Council’s Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts program, determined that becoming a nonprofit was the best course for the ensemble.
But the real answer to how E.L.C.O. came to be is through the hard work and dedication of a kick-ass group of adventurous, resilient, talented, and incredible young, professional artists who volunteer their time and skills to making interesting music. They’re the best! They blow my mind.
First thing you do each day?
- 4:45am – 5:00am: hit snooze on my alarm (set to Laurie Anderson’s “O Superman” as I find it motivating and not overly jarring as an alarm). Turn on podcast of choice.
- 5:00am – 5:05am: Floss and brush teeth.
- 5:05am – 5:10am: Turn on all the lights on the first floor of our home, then feed cat.
- 5:10am – 5:30am: Caffeine and get dressed while scrolling through social media, email and/or the Internet. I have a love/hate relationship with my smart phone.
- 5:30am-6:00am or 6:30am: Kickboxing DVD in my living room.
- Breakfast and shower post-kickboxing. I am now prepared to interact with my fellow humans. Woe be unto whomever interferes with my morning routine.
Between your work and your leadership role with E.L.C.O. – what keeps you motivated?
The kick-ass artists who have dedicated, volunteered, and invested their time, talent, and skills into E.L.C.O.! My brain sometimes likes to tell me that E.L.C.O. is too hard and that I can’t do it. When that happens, I remember those folks and I want to be as awesome as they are. I pick myself up and get I back to working on what I need to do.
Share a favorite time-saving or productivity hack:
Do one thing at a time. When I actually do this, it works like MAGIC.
Getting enough sleep and being appropriately – but not overly – caffeinated. Again – MAGIC.
Best piece of advice you’ve been given?
If you can think of anything else you want to do, do that instead, otherwise the arts are too hard. Work in the arts only because you can’t not do it.
What’s the best thing about the nonprofit sector in Pittsburgh?
The best thing is the sense of community and support that can be found here. All of the nonprofits I’ve approached regarding partnerships with E.L.C.O. have been so giving and filled with people that are a pleasure to work with. Also, I really love the Bayer Center for Nonprofit Management, Greater Pittsburgh Art Council’s Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts, and the Carnegie Library Foundation Center.
What are you listening to right now?
John Cage’s 4’33”. It’s the only way David and I can work.
What do you hope to accomplish in 2015?
We had a great 2014 – we tripled our typical performance schedule, with one performance being the largest we’d embarked upon to date, including an international guest artist who specialized on the Ondes Martenot – are rare electronic instrument. This year, we plan to revisit our more typical production schedule. We’re in the process of filing for our 501c3 status as well as planning a development strategy upon receipt of the new status.
We’re kicking off E.L.C.O.’s 2015 season with “Critical Band”, a concert of experimental orchestra music and ambient 90s shoegazer style stuff, on Sunday, March 15 – 2pm at the Charity Randall Theatre in Oakland. I would also love to invite everyone reading this to considering joining The Secret Society of the Eclectic Laboratory Chamber Orchestra at the end of 2015. Check E.L.C.O.’s Facebook page and website for clues leading up to the initiation ceremony.
|January 8, 2015||Posted by M. P. under Management, Program Model, Research|
Here’s your one word resolution for 2015 – collaborate. If you already are, do it strategically and more often. If you aren’t, you are missing out on a highly adaptable, relatively low-cost way to increase impact. A December 2014 study from the Bridgespan Group, in conjunction with The Lodestar Foundation, found that collaboration isn’t just a popular topic in the nonprofit sector – it’s actually happening and it’s working well for the majority of players.
Highlights from the study,
Collaboration is happening. The trend is real. Over 90 percent of the nonprofit leaders surveyed had participated in one of the forms of collaboration examined by the study (associations, joint programs, shared support functions, and mergers) within the last three years, with 54 percent participating in at least two forms. The majority (93 percent) of nonprofit executives expect to become involved in additional collaboration during 2015.
People in the sector like it. The majority (over 70 percent) of nonprofit executives described the collaborations they participated in as successful. Only a small percentage of each type of collaboration did not achieve their intended goals, according to respondent ratings.
People in the sector intend to do more of it. Both nonprofit executives and foundations reported their intention to do more collaboration in the future. Funders want to see more collaboration in the sector, specifically shared support functions (76 percent) and mergers (55 percent).
Additional findings, including the very real challenges facing quality collaboration, are included in the brief Making Sense of Nonprofit Collaborations by Alex Neuhoff, Katie Smith Milway, Reilly Kiernan, and Josh Grehan, available at the Bridgespan Group website.
One note of caution. Before you get the urge to start trimming programs also offered by peer organizations or make merger your “word for 2015″, check out the article Again, Nonprofit Mergers are no Cure All at Nonprofit Quarterly. Collaboration takes many forms and not all may be the best fit for your mission, constituency or bottom line. If collaboration is your resolution for 2015 then, as with all resolutions, start slowly, research what will work best for you, and keep at it.
|December 11, 2014||Posted by M. P. under Education, Federal Government, Juvenile Delinquency, News|
Earlier this week, the heads of the U.S. Department of Justice and Department of Education appeared at the Northern Virginia Juvenile Detention Center School for the joint release of a guidance package aimed at improving the quality of education for youths in juvenile justice facilities. The package lays out best practices for the provision of educational programming to confined juveniles, and includes
- guiding principles for education in secure juvenile facilities,
- a clarification letter on agency obligations around providing an appropriate education to youths with disabilities who are confined in juvenile justice facilities,
- a clarification letter on how federal civil right laws apply to educational services in juvenile justice facilities, and
- an explanation of federal student aid that may be available for eligible youth in the juvenile justice system.
Research supports the link between higher education and a reduced risk of recidivism, so ensuring that the right of an education extends to youths in the juvenile justice system (and with it the possibility of a post-secondary education) may result in lower criminal justice system costs in the future. The 2014 report Just Learning: The Imperative to Transform Juvenile Justice Systems into Effective Educational Systems from the Southern Education Foundation suggests that juvenile justice initiatives that work to prevent youth from re-offending could save society at least $2 million – and as much as $3.8 million – per youth over a decade.
You can read more about the costs and outcomes of the juvenile justice system in a 2011 post on juvenile incarceration.
|September 30, 2014||Posted by M. P. under Behavorial Health, Drug and Alcohol, Federal Government||
Alcohol consumption statistics have received much attention of late thanks to a Washington Post Wonkblog post citing material from the book Paying the Tab by Philip J. Cook and data from The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Those interested in alcohol consumption trends by adolescents and adults might also want to peruse the findings from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, an annual source of estimates on drug and alcohol use (although some categories are defined differently than those used by the NIAAA) and mental health in the United States.
According to a brief summarizing 2013 NSDUH data from the Substance Abuse and Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), last year more than half of Americans 12-years-and-over (52.2 percent) reported currently using alcohol, with approximately 23 percent classified as binge drinkers (defined as 5 or more drinks in one occasion). Just over 6 percent self-reported as heavy drinkers – 16.2 million adults and 293,000 12-to-17 year-olds. However, the use of alcohol within the past month and binge drinking both decreased among the 12-to-17-year-old group compared to 2012 data, from 12.9 percent to 11.6 percent and 7.2 percent to 6.2 percent, respectively.
Regarding drug use, 9.4 percent of adults used illicit drugs in 2013 with marijuana (7.6 percent), non-medical use of prescription drugs (1.7 percent) and cocaine (0.6 percent) as the top three drugs currently used. Among adolescents, 8.8 percent reported currently using drugs. Again, marijuana (7.1 percent) and non-medical use of prescriptions (2.2 percent) were the most popular currently used illicit substances, followed by hallucinogens (0.6) and inhalants (0.5).
Some of the reasons for not receiving drug and/or alcohol treatment by those who attempted to secure it (based on 2010-2013 data) include
- lack of health care coverage or inability to afford the cost – 37.3 percent,
- not ready to stop usage – 24.5 percent,
- unsure of where to find treatment – 9 percent, and
- health coverage that did not include rehabilitation – 8.2 percent.
The brief Substance Use and Mental Health Estimates from the 2013 National Survey in Drug Use and Health: Overview of Findings also contains data on the prevalence of mental and behavioral health issues among both adults and adolescents, including co-occurring mental health and substance abuse disorders.
Citation: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (September 4, 2014). The NSDUH Report: Substance Use and Mental Health Estimates from the
2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Overview of Findings. Rockville, MD.
Photo Credit: M. Puzzanchera (Own Work) (CC By-NC-ND 3.0)